Skip to content

Fix LSP dialyzer errors due to invalid Clock type - #1604

Merged
angelikatyborska merged 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
madlep:fix-clock-typespec
Nov 15, 2025
Merged

angelikatyborska merged 1 commit into
exercism:mainfrom
madlep:fix-clock-typespec

Conversation

@madlep

@madlep madlep commented Nov 14, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Define a t() type for the Clock struct, and use it in the function signatures to fix LSP dialyzer errors. Just using the module name in place of a struct isn't valid in this situation.

Define a `t()` type for the `Clock` struct, and use it in the function
signatures.

Just specifying module name ends up with LSP dialyzer errors
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for contributing to exercism/elixir 💜 🎉. This is an automated PR comment 🤖 for the maintainers of this repository that helps with the PR review process. You can safely ignore it and wait for a maintainer to review your changes.

Based on the files changed in this PR, it would be good to pay attention to the following details when reviewing the PR:

  • General steps

    • 🏆 Does this PR need to receive a label with a reputation modifier (x:size/{tiny,small,medium,large,massive})? (A medium reputation amount is awarded by default, see docs)
  • Any exercise changed

    • 👤 Does the author of the PR need to be added as an author or contributor in <exercise>/.meta/config.json (see docs)?
    • 🔬 Do the analyzer and the analyzer comments exist for this exercise? Do they need to be changed?
    • 📜 Does the design file (<exercise>/.meta/design.md) need to be updated to document new implementation decisions?
  • Practice exercise changed

    • 🌲 Do prerequisites, practices, and difficulty in config.json need to be updated?
    • 🧑‍🏫 Are the changes in accordance with the community-wide problem specifiations?

Automated comment created by PR Commenter 🤖.

@angelikatyborska angelikatyborska left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you very much! 🙌 We do have a dialyzer check running on CI, but it only checks example solutions, not the empty stub files. And for this exercise, those two happened to have an inconsistent approach to type annotations

@angelikatyborska
angelikatyborska merged commit 6f2c5fa into exercism:main Nov 15, 2025
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants